Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

22/07/24 12:44 PM IST

Governor’s immunity under Article 361

In News
  • The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a plea seeking to redefine the contours of the constitutional immunity enjoyed by the Governor of a state.
Constitutional immunity
  • Article 361 states that the President, or the Governor of a state, “shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties”, unless it is by Parliament for impeachment from office.
  • The provision further says “no criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued”; “no process for the arrest or imprisonment” can take place while the President, or the Governor, holds office.
  • The interpretation of these phrases — in Article 361(2) and 361(3) — “criminal proceedings” and “process for the arrest or imprisonment” is what is now before the SC.
  • The court will consider whether that process covers a registration of FIR, initiation of a preliminary inquiry, or a magistrate taking cognisance of an offence, which is the technical start of a criminal case.
Origins of Governor’s immunity
  • The protection given to the President and the Governor can be traced to the Latin maxim rex non potest peccare or “the king can do no wrong”, which is rooted in English legal traditions.
  • The Constituent Assembly discussed the introduction of Article 361 — or Draft Article 302 as it was known then — on September 8, 1949.
  • On criminal immunity, Assembly Member H V Kamath from the Indian National Congress raised certain prescient questions.
  • In case the President, or the Governor, commits a crime, he asked “Does this clause mean that no proceedings can be instituted against him (the President or the Governor) during the whole prescribed term, or whether it means while he is in office only”.
  • He also asked if the President should remove “a Governor or a Ruler committing a criminal act” in case a prima facie case is made against the Governor concerned.
  • However, the article was adopted without any further debate on criminal immunity.
  • In the last decade, the courts have shed light on what it means for criminal proceedings to be “instituted” against the Governor, and when the protection under Article 361(2) lapses.
Judicial interpretation
  • The SC did so in the 2017 criminal case — State vs Kalyan Singh & Ors — concerning the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992.
  • The court delayed the trial against then Rajasthan Governor Kalyan Singh, who was one of the accused in the case.
  • In its order, the SC said being the Governor, Kalyan Singh “is entitled to immunity under Article 361 of the Constitution as long as he remains Governor of Rajasthan.
  • The Court of Sessions will frame charges and move against him as soon as he ceases to be Governor”.
  • In 2015, the Madhya Pradesh High Court categorically held that Article 361(2) “guarantees absolute protection from any malicious campaign or publicity against the Head of a State, so as not to undermine the solemnity of that office.”
  • The observation came in a case pertaining to the Vyapam scam.
  • Then Governor of Madhya Pradesh Ram Naresh Yadav was one of the accused in the scam, and the HC had to determine if the registration of an FIR against him would amount to criminal proceedings being “instituted” in the case.
  • Another judicial intervention on the Governor’s immunity came in the landmark 2006 ruling in Rameshwar Prasad vs Union of India.
  • In the case, the SC had to deal with the Governor’s immunity in civil cases after recommending the Bihar Assembly’s dissolution in 2005.
  • The court said while the Governor enjoys “complete immunity” when exercising their powers under Article 361(1), this immunity “does not, however, take away the power of the Court to examine the validity of the action including on the ground of malafides (actions taken in bad faith)”.
  • The SC in that case examined the Governor’s actions in discharging his constitutional powers, which can be placed on a higher threshold compared to acts outside the discharge of constitutional or any official duties.
Source- Indian Express

More Related Current Affairs View All

09 Nov

Supreme Court ruling in AMU minority status case

'An educational institution established by a minority community will not lose its identity once it is recognised through a statute, the Supreme Court declared recently.' Chief

Read More

08 Nov

One Rank One Pension (OROP) in India

'As the One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme completes 10 years, data presented by the Defence Ministry reflects a significant financial expenditure for armed forces pensioners over

Read More

08 Nov

Can all private properties be acquired by the state?

'A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in a majority judgment (8:1), held that not every private resource can be considered a ‘material resource of the commun

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps