Sign In
Learn bits
World Affairs
Mahesh

26/03/24 09:34 AM IST

Hong Kong’s new Article 23 security legislation

In News
  • Hong Kong lawmakers fast-tracked the “Safeguarding National Security Bill,” unanimously passing recently, within a fortnight of it first being tabled in the Legislative Council on March 8.
  • Article 23 of the Basic Law mandates that the Hong Kong government must independently enact laws to prohibit national security offences.
Historical background
  • When the British, who had taken control of Hong Kong in the 19th century, handed over the territory to China in 1997, Beijing vowed to respect and preserve the region’s autonomy for 50 years as part of an agreed-upon policy, which came to be known as the “one country, two systems” principle.
  • The Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984 reflected the basic principles of the “one country, two systems” model and dictated the terms under which Hong Kong was to be returned to China.
  • The declaration and Hong Kong’s Basic Law, the city’s constitutional document that Beijing enacted in accord with the declaration, enshrined the city’s “capitalist system and way of life” and granted it “a high degree of autonomy” until 2047, says the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
  • On July 1, 1997, Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region of China and the Basic Law came into effect.
  • The Basic Law guaranteed the rule of law and basic freedom of speech, and was formally adopted by China’s National People’s Congress in 1990.
  • In 2020, Beijing bypassed the local legislature and imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong.
  • The law criminalised subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces to intervene in the city’s affairs.
  • It was widely seen as part of Beijing’s clampdown on dissent in response to the 2019 protests, as demonstrators were targeted and media outlets were shuttered.
  • The authorities have since arrested nearly 300 people, mostly pro-democracy activists, lawmakers, and journalists, charging over 170, while many others have been silenced or forced into self-exile.
  • Hong Kong officials felt that they needed to fill legal gaps, particularly to deal with “soft resistance” after the 2019 protests, since the Beijing-imposed law dealt with only some offences.
  • Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing leader John Lee said the “long-overdue” legislation was necessary to keep Hong Kong safe against “potential sabotage” and “undercurrents that try to create troubles,” — particularly ideas of ‘Hong Kong’s independence.’
Article 23
  • Article 23 of the Basic Law mandates that the Hong Kong government must independently enact laws to prohibit national security offences.
  • In 2003, a Bill related to Article 23 was first proposed, but the Hong Kong government was forced to withdraw the draft after nearly half a million people took to the streets in protest, fearing it would undermine civil liberties.
  • Nearly two decades later, in January this year, the local government began public consultation on a new local security law.
  • The legislation aimed to target “an extremely small minority of people who endanger national security,” according to the government.
  • The Bill was introduced in the city’s Opposition-free legislature on March 8 for examination following a month-long public consultation.
  • It was unanimously approved by lawmakers on March 19. The Hong Kong government claimed that its public consultation showed 99% support for the proposals.
Provisions of the bill
  • The legislation expands upon the 2020 Beijing-imposed security law, encompassing offences related to theft of state secrets, treason, insurrection, national security, and external influence.
  • It includes prison sentences of up to life for treason, insurrection, sabotage by colluding with external forces to damage public infrastructure and inciting members of the Chinese military to mutiny.
  • Further, it imposes 20 years of imprisonment for espionage and 10 years for the unlawful disclosure of state secrets and sedition.
  • The law grants police the authority to detain suspects for up to 16 days without charge and includes a provision for closed-door trials.
  • Treason: A person accused of committing treason faces up to 14 years in jail for partnering with an external armed force that is at war with China, to endanger the sovereignty, unity or territorial integrity of the nation, or threaten or use force; publicly manifesting intentions to commit treason; or failing to report to authorities about another person they know who is committing treason.
  • Sedition: A person who “does an act or utters a word” with seditious intentions, or colludes with an external force with such intention faces up to 10 years in jail. The jail sentence for inciting armed forces personnel to mutiny is life imprisonment. Under the law, a law enforcement official has the power to remove or obliterate publications that have seditious intentions.
  • Theft of secrets: If convicted of espionage, a person could face 20 years of imprisonment. Unlawful acquisition, possession and disclosure of state secrets is punishable with a person facing up to 10 years in jail. As per the law, a state secret can be related to any major policy decisions, defence, diplomatic affairs, technological developments and the relationship between the China and Hong Kong governments.
  • Endangering national security: A person accused of damaging public infrastructure with the intent to endanger national security faces 20 years in jail, and life imprisonment if the act is done in collusion with an external force. A person unlawfully using a computer or electronic system to endanger national security also faces 20 years in jail.
  • External interference: The law looks to prevent foreign organisations from operating in the city by imposing tougher penalties on people convicted of working with such bodies to interfere in or influence government policy, the Legislative Council, courts, or elections. A person faces up to 14 years for such “external interferences.”
Criticism of the bill
  • New legislation under Article 23 will bring a further devastating blow to the city’s autonomy, rule of law, rights and fundamental freedoms, beyond the impact of the National Security Law imposed by Beijing in 2020.
  • The legislation undermines due process and fair trial rights and violates Hong Kong’s obligations under international human rights law, jeopardising Hong Kong’s role as an open international city.
  • Separately, the United Nations has described the law as “a regressive step for the protection of human rights in Hong Kong,” warning that it could erode fundamental freedoms.
  • The U.K. has also cautioned against the law’s “far-reaching implications,” noting that its broad definitions of national security and external interference will make it harder for those living, working, and doing business in Hong Kong.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

15 Nov

Government issues guidelines to curb misleading ads by coaching centres

'The central Government issued new guidelines aimed at curbing misleading advertisements by coaching institutes, specifically prohibiting false promises such as "100 per cent selec

Read More

15 Nov

Janjatiya Gaurav Divas

'Every year on November 15th, Janjatiya Gaurav Divas is celebrated to honor the contributions of these communities, especially in India’s freedom struggle.' 5th November

Read More

15 Nov

Supreme Court’s order on mandatory accessibility standards

'A bench of the Supreme Court last week ordered the Union government to frame mandatory rules for ensuring the accessibility of public places and services to persons with disabilit

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps