Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

17/09/24 11:20 AM IST

Impact of emergency provisions on Centre-State relations

In News
  • The recent spate of renewed violence in Manipur has once again triggered the discussion around Centre-State relations and the use of emergency provisions by the Centre.
Emergency Provisions
  • The emergency provisions are provided in Part XVIII of the Constitution.
  • Articles 355 and 356 deal primarily with the affairs of government in a State under this part.
  • Article 355 imposes a duty on the Centre to protect every State from external aggression and internal disturbance.
  • It also specifies that the Centre should ensure that every State government operate according to the Constitution.
  • Article 356 allows for the imposition of the President’s rule if a State’s government cannot function in accordance with constitutional provisions.
  • While in the U.S. and Australia, federal government functions also involve protecting States, their constitutions do not contain provisions for removing State governments.
  • B.R. Ambedkar explained the purpose of Article 355, keeping in mind the federal character of our polity, that if the Centre is to interfere in the State’s administration under Article 356, it must be by or under some obligation which the Constitution imposes on the Centre.
  • Hence, Article 355 was incorporated to check any arbitrary or unauthorised use of Article 356.
S R Bommai case (1994) 
  • The court held that Article 356 should be imposed only in the event of a breakdown of constitutional machinery, as distinguished from an ordinary breakdown of law and order.
  • It also held that the imposition of the President’s rule is subject to judicial review and should not be misused for political reasons.
  • The  scope of Article 355 has been widened by various Supreme Court rulings.
  • In State of Rajasthan Vs Union of India (1977), the court had a narrow interpretation of Article 355 as justifying the employment of Article 356.
  • However, in subsequent cases such as Naga People’s Movement of Human Rights Vs Union of India (1998), Sarbananda Sonowal Vs Union of India (2005), and H.S.Jain Vs Union of India (1997), the legal position with respect to Article 355 has shifted.
  • The scope of actions under this article has been widened to permit all statutorily and constitutionally available actions by the Union to discharge its duties of protecting the State and ensuring that its governance is in accordance with the Constitution.
Way forward
  • The Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State Relations (1987), the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (2002), and the Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations (2010) have all opined that Article 355 not only imposes a duty on the Union but also grants it the power to take necessary actions for the effective performance of that duty.
  • Imposition of the President’s rule under Article 356 must be used as a last resort in situations of utmost gravity and urgency.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

14 Nov

India’s tea, sugar exports raise sustainability concerns at home

'India is one of the world’s largest agricultural product exporters.' The Indian agricultural export is valued at $53.1 billion in 2022-2023, up from $8.7 billion in 2004-

Read More

14 Nov

Superbugs and the looming public health crisis

'LESS than a hundred years ago, antibiotics ushered in an era that transformed medical care.' It saved millions of lives and accelerated the development and use of complex surge

Read More

13 Nov

Healthy longevity initiative

'The World Bank report proposes a healthy longevity initiative (HLI) which takes a life course approach.' Briefly, healthy longevity entails sharply reducing avoidable death and

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps