Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

26/01/24 12:42 PM IST

legal dispute over AMU’s minority status

In News
  • A seven-judge Bench of the Supreme Court (SC) led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud is currently hearing the 57-year-long dispute over the minority character of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU).
Constitutional provisions
  • Article 30(1) in Part III of the Constitution empowers all religious and linguistic minorities with a fundamental right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
  • Clause 2 ensures that the State maintains ‘equality of treatment’ in granting aid to all educational institutions, irrespective of their minority status.
  • This includes educational institutions at all levels, from primary schools to professional education.
  • Notably, these institutions enjoy exemptions from the implementation of SC, ST, and OBC reservations in both admissions and employment.
  • Additionally, they can reserve up to 50% of seats for students from their community and exercise greater control over employees compared to other institutions. In the
  • T.M.A Pai Foundation (2002) case, the SC clarified that a ‘minority’ is to be determined by the concerned State’s demography, not the national population.
Background of the case
  • In 1877, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, a Muslim reformer, founded the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College (MAO College) at Aligarh to address Muslim educational backwardness while protecting Islamic values.
  • The Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 (AMU Act) was passed to incorporate the MAO college and the Muslim University Association into AMU.
  • In 1951, the AMU Act was amended, removing compulsory religious education for Muslims and the exclusive Muslim representation mandate in the University Court.
  • The Act was further amended in 1965, and the powers of the Court were redistributed among other bodies including the executive, with the President of India nominating members to the governing body.
  • The legal dispute began in 1967 when the SC in S. Azeez Basha versus Union of India (UOI), reviewed the 1951 and 1965 amendments. The petitioners argued that since Muslims established AMU, they had the right to manage it.
  • In 2005, AMU reserved 50% of postgraduate medical seats for Muslim candidates.
  • The Allahabad High Court struck down the reservation policy in Dr Naresh Agarwal vs UOI (2005) holding the 1981 amendment ultra vires.
  • Consequently, in 2006, the UOI and the University appealed to the SC. However, in 2016, the UOI withdrew from the appeal, refusing to acknowledge the University’s minority status. The University is now pursuing the case alone.
Present status of the case
  • The apex court is addressing two issues — the criteria for determining the minority status of an educational institution and whether an institution established under a statute can enjoy such status.
  • While the petitioners argue that AMU is entitled to the minority status, the UOI is now endorsing the S. Azeez Basha verdict.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

08 Jan

Airline pilots’ body calls attention to lithium battery fire risk

'Recently, the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) issued three position papers on the fire risk due to the use of lithium-ion batteries in air

Read More

08 Jan

V. Narayanan, who is set to take over as ISRO Chairman

'V. Narayanan, a noted rocket and spacecraft propulsion expert, is set to succeed S. Somanath as the next Chairman of Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO).' Dr. Narayanan

Read More

08 Jan

Rat-hole mining

'Several workers have been trapped for more than 12 hours in a coal “rat-hole” mine after it was flooded with water  in Dima Hasao district of Assam.' The rescu

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps