Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

01/11/23 06:54 AM IST

Maratha quota protest heats up

In News
  • As Maratha quota protests intensify in Maharashtra, the state government has formed a panel of three former High Court judges to advise it on the legal battle over the issue in the Supreme Court
Maratha Quota
  • The Marathas are a group of castes comprising peasants and landowners, among others, constituting nearly 33 per cent of state’s population.
  • The demand for Maratha reservation is not new in the state.
  • The first protest over this was held 32 years ago by Mathadi Labour Union leader Annasaheb Patil in Mumbai.
High court judgement
  • The High Court relied heavily on findings of the 11-member Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) headed by retired Justice G M Gaikwad.
  • The Committee surveyed about 45,000 families, from two villages in each of the 355 talukas that had more than 50 per cent Maratha population.
  • The November 2015 report found the Maratha community to be socially, economically and educationally backward.
  • In social backwardness, the Commission found that around 76.86 % of Maratha families are engaged in agriculture and agricultural labour for their livelihood and nearly 70% reside in Kachha dwellings, while only 35- 39 % have personal tap water connections.
  • Moreover, the report said that in 2013-2018, a total of 2,152 (23.56%) Maratha farmers died by suicide, against total 13, 368 farmer suicides.
  • The Commission also found that 88.81 % Maratha women are involved in physical labour for earning a livelihood, besides the physical domestic work they perform for the family.
  • In educational backwardness, it found that 13.42 % of Marathas are illiterate, 35.31 % primary educated, 43.79 % HSC and SSC, 6.71 % undergraduates and postgraduates and 0.77 % technically and professionally qualified.
Supreme court Judgement
  • In May 2021, a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court struck down the Maratha quota, which took the total reservation in the state above the 50 per cent ceiling set by the court in its 1992 Indra Sawhney (Mandal) judgment.       
  • The Apex court said that the 50% ceiling, although an arbitrary determination by the court in 1992, is now constitutionally recognised. It said there was no extraordinary circumstance to cross the 50% mark, adding Marathas were a “dominant forward class and are in the main stream of National life”.
  • The quota had been challenged in the Supreme Court by lawyer Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil and others.
  • In November 2022, after the SC upheld the 10 per cent quota for Economically Weaker Sections, the Maharashtra government said that until the issue of Maratha reservation was resolved, economically weaker members of the community could benefit from the EWS quota.
  • In April this year, after the SC turned down its review plea, the state government said it would file a curative petition and form a new panel for a detailed survey of the ‘backwardness’ of the community.
Reservation in Maharashtra
  • In the state, following the 2001 State Reservation Act, the total reservation is 52 per cent.
  • This included quotas for Scheduled Caster (13%), Scheduled Tribes (7%), Other Backward Classes (19%), Special Backward Class (2%), Vimukta Jati (3%), Nomadic Tribe B (2.5%), Nomadic Tribe C-Dhangar (3.5%) and Nomadic Tribe D-Vanjari (2%).
  • With the addition of the 12-13 per cent Maratha quota, the total reservation in the state had gone up to 64-65 per cent. The 10 % EWS quota is also effective in the state.
  • Besides Marathas, communities including Dhangar, Lingayats and Muslims have also raised demands for reservation.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

24 Sep

Leveraging transit-oriented development to build productive cities

'Indian cities are on the brink of a transportation revolution, with a projected expenditure of ?3 trillion (between 2022–2027) set to be spent on approved metro rail project

Read More

24 Sep

Section 107 of BNSS

'The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, introduced Section 107, which deals with properties which are “proceeds of crime”.' Until recently, this term w

Read More

24 Sep

Supreme Court strengthened child pornography law

'Tightening the law on child pornography, the Supreme Court recently said that even viewing, possessing, and not reporting such content is punishable under the Protection of Childr

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps