Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

02/03/24 12:22 PM IST

On cross-voting in Rajya Sabha elections

In News
  • The Rajya Sabha elections in the States of Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Karnataka witnessed cross-voting by MLAs belonging to different parties.
Elections in Rajya Sabha
  • As per Article 80 of the Constitution, representatives of each State to the Rajya Sabha are elected indirectly by the elected members of their Legislative Assembly.
  • The polls for Rajya Sabha will be required only if the number of candidates exceed the number of vacancies.
  • In fact, till 1998, the outcome of Rajya Sabha elections were usually a foregone conclusion.
  • The candidates nominated by various parties, according to their strength in the Assembly, used to be elected unopposed.
  • However, the June 1998 Rajya Sabha elections in Maharashtra witnessed cross-voting that resulted in the loss of a Congress party candidate.
  • In order to rein in the MLAs from such cross-voting, an amendment to the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was carried out in 2003.
  • Section 59 of the Act was amended to provide that the voting in elections to Rajya Sabha shall be through an open ballot.
  • The MLAs of political parties are required to show their ballot paper to the authorised agent of their Party.
  • Not showing the ballot paper to the authorised agent or showing it to anyone else will disqualify the vote. Independent MLAs are barred from showing their ballots to anyone.
Tenth Schedule
  • The 52nd constitutional amendment introduced the ‘anti-defection’ law through the Tenth Schedule in 1985.
  • This Schedule provides that a member of a House of Parliament or State legislature who voluntarily gives up the membership of their political party or votes against the instructions of their party in a House are liable for disqualification from such House.
  • This instruction with respect to voting is issued by the ‘whip’ of a party.
  • However, the elections to Rajya Sabha are not treated as a proceeding within the Legislative Assembly.
  • The Election Commission, drawing reference to Supreme Court judgments, had issued a clarification in July 2017.
  • It specified that the provisions of the Tenth Schedule, with respect to voting against the instruction of the party, will not be applicable for a Rajya Sabha election. Furthermore, political parties cannot issue any ‘whip’ to its members for such elections.
Supreme Court Judgement
  • The Supreme Court in Kuldip Nayar versus Union of India (2006), upheld the system of open ballot for Rajya Sabha elections.
  • It reasoned that if secrecy becomes a source for corruption, then transparency has the capacity to remove it.
  • However, in the same case the court held that an elected MLA of a political party would not face disqualification under the Tenth Schedule for voting against their party candidate.
  • He/she may at the most attract disciplinary action from their political party.
  • The Supreme Court has also held in Ravi S. Naik and Sanjay Bandekar versus Union of India (1994), that voluntarily giving up membership under the Tenth Schedule is not synonymous with only formally resigning from the party to which the member belongs.
  • The conduct of a member both inside and outside the house can be looked into to infer if it qualifies as voluntarily giving up membership.
Way Forward
  • It is to uphold the higher principle of free and fair elections and its purity that the court upheld the system of open ballot to Rajya Sabha elections.
  • However, the instances of cross-voting in the last decade have defeated the intent behind this procedure.
  • It would be wishful thinking to expect any further amendments to strengthen the Constitution or laws against such voting practices since ruling parties’ benefit from such unprincipled tactics.
  • Voting by an MLA against his/her political party in a Rajya Sabha election may well be construed as a strong reason to infer that the member had voluntarily given up membership of such party.
  • If the court decides so, this would be a valid ground for disqualification under the Tenth Schedule. It would hopefully act as a deterrent against such cross-voting in the future.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

10 Jan

Rural landowners in Delhi want repeal of Sections 33 and 81 of Delhi Land Reforms Act

'Both sections dealing with the use and sale of agricultural land have come under the spotlight ahead of the Delhi Assembly elections.' This can only be done by the Central gove

Read More

10 Jan

Pravasi Bharatiya Diwas

'Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the 18th edition of the Pravasi Bharatiya Diwas  in Bhubaneswar.' The event is held once every two years to “honour the cont

Read More

10 Jan

Deciphering the Indus script

'Recently, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin announced a $1-million prize for experts or organisations in the event of their success in deciphering the scripts of the Indus Val

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps