Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

24/09/24 11:58 AM IST

Section 107 of BNSS

In News
  • The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, introduced Section 107, which deals with properties which are “proceeds of crime”.
Section 107
  • Section 107 of the BNSS gives unbridled powers to the court to not only attach any property (on the request of the police during investigation), but also to forfeit the proceeds of crime to the government under certain conditions.
  • Under this section, any police officer making an investigation, with the approval of the Superintendent of Police or the Commissioner of Police, may make an application to the court for the attachment of property if he has reason to believe that the property is derived or obtained as a result of a criminal activity.
  • The PMLA says where an officer has reason to believe that a person is in possession of any proceeds of crime, the officer should record the reason for such belief in writing.
  • If the officer has reason to believe at “such proceeds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime, he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not exceeding 90 days.”
  • There is no such condition prescribed under Section 107 of the BNSS.
  • Further, while the property may be attached by an authorised officer only after forwarding the report to a magistrate under Section 173 of the CrPC (i.e., on completion of investigation), the property under Section 107 of the BNSS may be attached during the investigation itself.
PMLA Act
  • The PMLA provides that the property involved in money laundering shall be disposed of by the Adjudicating Authority only on the conclusion of a trial of the offence.
  • However, Section 107 of the BNSS is silent about the stage of disposal of such property. It says that if the court or magistrate “finds the attached or seized properties to be the proceeds of crime”, it shall order the District Magistrate “to rateably distribute such proceeds of crime to the persons who are affected by such crime”.
  • In case there are no claimants or there is any surplus after satisfying the claimants, such proceeds of crime shall stand forfeited to the government.
  • An entire chapter of the BNSS deals with the disposal of property.
  • These provisions replicate the CrPC provisions except that Section 497 of the BNSS mandates the court or the magistrate to take a photo or video of the property to enable these to be used as evidence during trial or inquiry.
  • The Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (2003) had dealt with the jurisdiction of the court to record evidence promptly to avoid tampering, so that the police or the court would not be required to keep the article in safe custody and the owner of the article would not suffer.
  • This chapter deals with contingencies such as the custody and disposal of property pending trial, the disposal of property at the conclusion of the trial, and restoration of possession of immovable property.
  • Even if the property is perishable, it may be sold, but the final disposal is to be done only on the conclusion of trial or inquiry by the court. 
Safeguards
  • Section 107 of the BNSS requires the court to issue a show-cause notice returnable within 14 days on why an order of attachment of property (i.e., proceeds of crime) shall not be made.
  • If the person concerned does not represent his case, the court may proceed to pass the ex parte order. Further, if the court finds the attached properties to be the proceeds of the crime and it orders the District Magistrate to distribute the property to its claimants, the District Magistrate shall distribute such property within 60 days of the order.
  • There are no guidelines for the District Magistrate to identify the claimants to do the needful.
  • Thus, theoretically, the proceeds of crime or property may be disposed of in about three months of time, without the investigation or trial coming to an end. This section is silent about the stage at which the court or the magistrate has to take this call.
  • Article 300A of the Constitution says “no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law”. It has been given the status of a basic human right. It is also a settled principle that “law” means a validly enacted law which is just, fair, and reasonable. 
Way forward
  • There is no provision in the BNS which defines or deals with the ‘proceeds of crime’ except for the use of similar terms in sections dealing with ‘organised crime’ and ‘terrorist act’.
  • The legislative intent of introducing Section 107 in the BNSS appears to be to empower States (as the PMLA is a Central Act) to undertake expeditious disposal and distribution of the proceeds of crime to its rightful claimants.
  • But it is fraught with legal and practical problems.
  • While identifying the rightful claimants may not be easy for the investigating officer, final disposal of such property by the court without a proper trial does not appear to be a just, fair, and reasonable procedure. 
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

14 Nov

India’s tea, sugar exports raise sustainability concerns at home

'India is one of the world’s largest agricultural product exporters.' The Indian agricultural export is valued at $53.1 billion in 2022-2023, up from $8.7 billion in 2004-

Read More

14 Nov

Superbugs and the looming public health crisis

'LESS than a hundred years ago, antibiotics ushered in an era that transformed medical care.' It saved millions of lives and accelerated the development and use of complex surge

Read More

13 Nov

Healthy longevity initiative

'The World Bank report proposes a healthy longevity initiative (HLI) which takes a life course approach.' Briefly, healthy longevity entails sharply reducing avoidable death and

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps