Sign In
Learn bits
World Affairs
Mahesh

11/01/24 07:24 AM IST

South Africa taken Israel to the International Court of Justice

In News
  • The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will hold a two-day hearing to decide whether it will order “provisional measures” in a case that South Africa has filed against Israel for violating its obligations under the Genocide Convention in relation to Palestinians in Gaza.
About ICJ
  • The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations that settles legal disputes between States in accordance with international law.
  • It is not a criminal court, and it does not try individuals. That is the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Both courts are in The Hague, the Netherlands.
  • The ICJ cannot automatically decide all cases involving breaches of international law. It can only decide cases that are brought before it by States that consent to its jurisdiction.
  • This consent can be expressed in different ways. In this case, the consent stems from an article in the Genocide Convention that states that disputes between parties relating to the interpretation, application, or fulfilment of the Convention, including disputes relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide, shall be submitted to the ICJ at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.
  • Both South Africa and Israel are parties to the Convention.
Genocide convention
  • The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide is an international human rights treaty that codified the crime of genocide for the first time.
  • The Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1948, and has been in effect since January 12, 1951.
  • The Convention defines genocide as five acts — 
  • killing members of a group;
  • causing serious bodily or mental harm; 
  • inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction;
  • imposing measures intended to prevent births within a group; and
  • forcibly transferring children of the group to another group — committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
  • There are, therefore, two elements: the physical acts; and the specific intent “to destroy, in whole or in part” a specific group. Committing these acts, however widespread, is not enough to make a claim of genocide.
  • The specific intent to destroy (dolus specialisis) is what distinguishes genocide from war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.
  • Also, the commission of war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity do not provide an avenue for States to approach the ICJ because the court does not have automatic jurisdiction over those crimes.
South Africa's case
  • South Africa alleges that Israel has committed several of these acts, and that the evidence of Israeli State officials’ specific intent (dolus specialis) to commit and persist in committing genocidal acts or to fail to prevent them has been significant and overt since October 2023.
  • This, when combined with the level of killing, maiming, displacement and destruction on the ground, together with the siege “evidence an unfolding and continuing genocide.
  • South Africa argues that urgent relief is necessary to protect against further, severe, and irreparable harm to the rights of the Palestinian people which continue to be violated, and to prevent any aggravation or extension of the dispute.
  • It has also asked the court to direct Israel to not commit any further acts, including engaging in direct and public incitement to commit genocide, conspiracy, attempt to commit, or complicity in genocide, and to prevent the destruction of evidence, including by not denying access to fact-finding missions.
  • It wants Israel to report on the measures taken to implement the court’s order, and to refrain from acts which might aggravate the dispute.
Source- Indian Express

More Related Current Affairs View All

20 Feb

The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999

'Investors who were defrauded in the Torres Ponzi scam may receive about Rs 40 crore over the next six months.' The Mumbai Police’s Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has begun

Read More

18 Feb

Aravali safari park project

'The Haryana government’s ambitious 3,858 hectare Aravali safari park project spread across Gurugram and Nuh — which was one of the poll promises of the ruling Bharatiy

Read More

17 Feb

President’s rule function

'Recently,  four days after Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh’s resignation, the Union government announced that President’s rule has been implemented in the v

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps