Sign In
Learn bits
Economy
Mahesh

20/02/25 09:34 AM IST

The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999

In News
  • Investors who were defrauded in the Torres Ponzi scam may receive about Rs 40 crore over the next six months.
  • The Mumbai Police’s Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has begun the procedure to commence auctioning the seized properties of the accused parties, under the MPID Act.
MPID Act
  • The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, was enacted by the state legislature, and received the President’s assent on January 21, 2000.
  • At its introduction, the bill identified the growth of financial establishments in the state, with some intending to defraud the public by grabbing their deposited money.
  • These investors mostly belonged to the middle class and poor economic backgrounds, and were lured with the promise of unprecedented interest rates or returns.
  • As such deposits run into crores of rupees, it has resulted in great public resentment and uproar, creating law and order problems in the State of Maharashtra, especially in the city like Mumbai which is treated as the financial capital of India.
  • It is, therefore, expedient to make a suitable legislation in the public interest to curb the unscrupulous activities of such Financial Establishments in the State of Maharashtra.
Main Provisions
  • The Act states that any financial establishment which fraudulently defaults repayment of deposit on maturity along with benefit in the form of interest, bonus, profit as assured, then every person including its promoter, partner, director, manager, employee responsible for the management or conducting business, can be held responsible.
  • If found guilty, they can be sentenced to imprisonment for a maximum term of six years and fined up to Rs 1 lakh.
  • The Act also empowers the government to issue an order attaching the money or other property believed to have been acquired by the financial establishment.
  • It lays out the procedure to be followed with powers designated to courts to make the order of attachment absolute.
  • Once an order is passed, the court can issue directions for the sale of the assets and its equitable distribution of the amount among the depositors.
  • Unlike the provisions in criminal law which deal with cheating and fraud by financial establishments, the speedy procedure for attachment and distribution of the properties makes the Act significant for depositors.
  • In 2005, the Bombay High Court ruled that the MPID Act was unconstitutional as its provisions were at variance with the central law under the Companies Act, 1956.
  • The high court said that the Maharashtra Act transgressed into the field reserved for the Parliament, with the aspect of non-payment of returns by non-banking financial establishments already covered by the Companies Act and the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
Supreme Court Judgment
  • The Supreme Court held both the MPID Act and the Tamil Nadu Act constitutionally valid.
  • It held that the financial establishments booked under the state laws had not obtained any licence from the RBI.
  • The apex court held that the existing central laws do not occupy the field of these state laws.
  • According to the SC, the state laws intended to attach and sell properties of fraudulent financial institutions to provide an effective and speedy remedy to aggrieved depositors.
  • The conventional legal proceedings incurring huge expenses of court fees, advocates’ fees, apart from other inconveniences involved and the long delay in disposal of cases due to docket explosion in Courts, would not have made it possible for the depositors to recover their money, leave alone the interest thereon.
  • In 2022 too, the Supreme Court held the Act valid.
  • There have been issues raised before courts on what constitutes deposits or financial establishments, which have been decided based on the merits of the particular case.
Source- Indian Express

More Related Current Affairs View All

18 Feb

Aravali safari park project

'The Haryana government’s ambitious 3,858 hectare Aravali safari park project spread across Gurugram and Nuh — which was one of the poll promises of the ruling Bharatiy

Read More

17 Feb

President’s rule function

'Recently,  four days after Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh’s resignation, the Union government announced that President’s rule has been implemented in the v

Read More

17 Feb

DDoS cyberattack that hit Karnataka’s Kaveri 2.0 portal

'In January, web-based portal Kaveri 2.0, which streamlines property registrations in Karnataka, faced sporadic, crippling server outages.' As a result, property registration an

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps