Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

02/04/24 05:16 AM IST

The PMLA — a law that has lost its way

In News
  • The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 was enacted with a distinct objective.
  • The humongous volume of black money generated through international drug trafficking posed a grave threat to the economy of many countries.
Background
  • All countries were urged to take urgent steps to prevent the laundering of the proceeds of drug crimes and other connected activities.
  • Subsequent to this, seven major industrial nations held a summit in Paris (July 1989) and established the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to examine the problem of money laundering and recommend measures to tackle this menace.
  • Thereafter, in 1990, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution, namely, the Political Declaration and Global Programme of Action which called upon all member-countries to enact suitable pieces of legislation to effectively prevent the laundering of drug money.
  • In pursuance of this resolution of the UN General Assembly, the Government of India used the recommendations of the FATF to formulate a legislation to prevent drug money laundering.
  • As drug trafficking is a trans-border operation, the UN held a special session on June 10, 1998 on the theme ‘Countering World Drug Problem Together’ and made another declaration on the urgent need to combat money laundering.
  • Accordingly, the Indian Parliament enacted the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in 2002. But it was brought into force in 2005.
  • The main focus of the law is on combating the laundering of drug money. Accordingly, the Act of 2002 contained a few offences listed in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
  • The UN resolutions, and the FATF recommendations are all focused on the prevention of money from the laundering of drugs.
  • However, the PMLA of India acquired a different character through amendments from time to time. 
About PMLA
  • The law on money laundering revolves around the “crime proceeds” which are laundered.
  • Not only the persons involved directly in the crime and the generation of the crime proceeds but also persons who have nothing to do with the crime but who have some involvement at a later stage in the laundering process are also guilty under this law.
  • But the most serious aspect of the PMLA is that it includes a large number of offences in the schedule which have nothing to do with the original purpose of this law — namely, combating the laundering of drug money.
  • The UN resolution on the basis of which the law on laundering was enacted in India spoke only about the offence of the laundering of drug money.
  • This was considered the most serious economic crime which had the potential to destabilise the world economy and endanger the sovereignty of nations, as highlighted above. The preamble to the PMLA endorses it.
  • So, there was global consensus on the need to have a tough law to deal effectively with this crime.
  • Thus, the raison d’etre of the PMLA is the crime of the laundering of a huge volume of black money generated from the international drug trade and the spectre of destabilisation of the world economy.

The PMLA’s enactment
  • The PMLA was enacted by India’s Parliament under Article 253 which empowers it to make laws for implementing the international conventions.
  • This Article indicates that a law Parliament makes to implement any decision of an international body will be confined to the subject matter of that decision.
  • Item 13 in the Union list of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution is specific on this point.
  • Thus, the law on money laundering enacted under Article 253 and Item 13 of the Union list in the context of the UN resolution referred to above can only be on drug money.
  • Various amendments made in this Act at different times bloated the schedule which now contains such offences which are either ordinary offences listed in the IPC or for which there are special laws in force.
  • Since money laundering as an offence is linked to one of the scheduled offences, the offences contained in the schedule become the starting point of the whole process of operationalisation of the PMLA.
  • The provisions contained in it are draconian which were meant to deal with the dangerous men involved in drug trafficking and the money chain. These provisions are now being used in other scheduled offences too without mitigating their rigour.
  • Offences which by their very nature do not generate crime proceeds of a scale which can destabilise the economy and endanger the sovereignty of the nation are being tried under this law. One such example is the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which is aimed at curbing corruption among public servants.
  • This Act was added to the schedule of offences in 2009.
  • The PMLA now applies with all its rigour to public servants.
  • Thus, a public servant charged with corruption and a hard-core drug trafficker are treated alike. A very disturbing thing about the PMLA is that an accused under this law is presumed to be guilty until proved innocent.
The bail provision
  • The bail provision of the PMLA Act (Section 45) is invested with a lot of political significance in present day India.
  • It was held unconstitutional by a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India in Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union of India (2018) as violating Article 14 and Article 21.
  • However, Parliament, with great alacrity, restored this provision with certain amendments which was upheld by a three-judge Bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union of India (2022).
  • The top court held that this provision is reasonable and has direct nexus with the purposes and objects of the PMLA Act. Herein lies the problem.
  • The object of the Act is to curb the laundering of black money and to save the economy from being destabilised. But what about less serious offences which have found a place in the schedule? The learned judges nearly said that inclusion of a particular offence in the schedule comes within the domain of the legislative policy.
  • Personal liberty, deprived when bail is refused, is too precious a value of our constitutional system recognised under Article 21 that the curial power to negate it is a great trust exercisable, not casually but judicially, with lively concern for the cost to the individual and the community”.
Source- The Hindu

More Related Current Affairs View All

15 Nov

Government issues guidelines to curb misleading ads by coaching centres

'The central Government issued new guidelines aimed at curbing misleading advertisements by coaching institutes, specifically prohibiting false promises such as "100 per cent selec

Read More

15 Nov

Janjatiya Gaurav Divas

'Every year on November 15th, Janjatiya Gaurav Divas is celebrated to honor the contributions of these communities, especially in India’s freedom struggle.' 5th November

Read More

15 Nov

Supreme Court’s order on mandatory accessibility standards

'A bench of the Supreme Court last week ordered the Union government to frame mandatory rules for ensuring the accessibility of public places and services to persons with disabilit

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps