Sign In
Learn bits
Polity & Governance
Mahesh

06/11/24 09:50 AM IST

Not all private property is ‘material resource of community’ for redistribution

In News
  • A 9-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held recently that the government cannot acquire and redistribute all privately owned properties.
Article 31C
  • Article 31C originally stood to protect laws enacted to ensure the “material resources of the community” are distributed to serve the common good (Article 39(b)) and that wealth and the means of production are not “concentrated” to the “common detriment” (Article 39(c)).
  • However, in the pre-emergency era, in the aftermath of the Court striking down the government’s socialist policies such as the Bank Nationalisation Case, Article 31C was amended by The Constitution (Twenty-fifth) Amendment Act, 1971.
  • It said: “…no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39 shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14, article 19 or article 31; and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy”.
  • Again, in 1976, Parliament enacted The Constitution (Forty-second) Amendment Act, which expanded the protection under Article 31C to “all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV of the Constitution”, under clause 4.
  • As a result, every single directive principle (Articles 36-51) was protected from challenges under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.
  • This too, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1980 judgment in Minerva Mills v. Union of India.
  • In 2024, the question before the SC was whether the SC between 1978-1980 struck down Article 31C as a whole, or did it restore the post-Kesavananda Bharati position wherein Articles 39(b) and (c) remained protected.
  • The SC has said that the post-Kesavananda position is restored.
Interpretation of Article 39(b)
  • The second question before the Court was whether the government can acquire and redistribute privately owned properties if they are deemed as “material resources of the community” — as mentioned in Article 39(b) of the Constitution.
  • Falling under Part IV of the Constitution titled “Directive Principles of State Policy” (DPSP), Article 39(b) places an obligation on the state to create policy towards securing “the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good”.
  • DPSP are meant to be guiding principles for the enactment of laws, but are not directly enforceable in any court of law.
  • Since 1977, the apex court has weighed in on the interpretation of Article 39(b) on multiple occasions — most notably, in State of Karnataka v Shri Ranganatha Reddy (1977).
  • This case saw a seven-judge Bench, by a 4:3 majority, holding that privately owned resources did not fall within the ambit of “material resources of the community”.
  • Article 39(b) was later affirmed by a five-judge Bench in Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company v Bharat Coking Coal (1983), where the court upheld central legislation that nationalised coal mines and their respective coke oven plants relying on what Justice Iyer had ruled.
  • It held that the provision “takes within its stride the transformation of wealth from private-ownership into public ownership and is not confined to that which is already public-owned”.
Source- Indian Express

More Related Current Affairs View All

06 Nov

Aadhaar biometric data access will aid forensics

'The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has strict regulations about the disclosure of data in order to protect a person’s right to privacy and ensure that ther

Read More

06 Nov

Rising STEM research demands revitalised education

'Higher educational institutions in India face significant challenges.' While private engineering colleges, the newer Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) and universities have

Read More

06 Nov

UP Madarsa Education Act upheld by SC

'UP Madarsa Education Act: A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, presided over by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, upheld the Constitutional validity of the Uttar Prades

Read More

India’s First Ai-Driven Magazine Generator

Generate Your Custom Current Affairs Magazine using our AI in just 3 steps